Go CCIE Go!! - A Cisco Certified Internetwork Expert

In my humble opinion, I don’t know whether it is worth or not. Proctor will re-grade your test result, but he/she won’t say anything except the pass/fail. So probably it will be the same result unless new proctor thinks different way. So if you are suspicious about some questions you answered, they won’t […]

Just use different numbers for each configuration line. Example follows:
frame-relay switching ! interface Serial6 description Connection from R2 to R4/5/6 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast encapsulation frame-relay frame-relay intf-type dce clock rate 64000 frame-relay route 104 interface Serial9 401 frame-relay route 105 interface Serial5 501 frame-relay route 106 interface Serial7 601 no shut […]

Once you go and try this local policy routing trick from the link you sent:
R1(config)#int loopback 0 R1(config-if)#ip ad 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.255 R1(config-if)#exit R1(config)#route-map LOCAL_POLICY R1(config-route-map)#set interface loopback 0 R1(config-route-map)#exit R1(config)#ip local policy route-map LOCAL_POLICY R1(config)#END R1#telnet 12.0.0.2 Trying 12.0.0.2 … Open
doesn’t that affect everything else too unless you use an ACL in the local policy? […]

No you are correct, they are both accomplishing the same thing. Whether you learn the MAC address through IGMP snooping or install it statically the switch is simply adding an entry into the CAM table for that destination mac-address:
Rack1SW1#sh run | include igmp|mac-address ip igmp snooping vlan 10 static 0100.5e01.0203 […]

You can force it to be reflected by policy routing it and making it appear as transit traffic to the router:
http://www.groupstudy.com/archives/ccielab/200311/msg01170.html
Either that or you need to statically permit inbound all traffic destined to the local router that is necessary (routing protocols, icmp echo-reply, traceroute replies, etc.)
HTH,
Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593 bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com
Internetwork Expert, Inc. http://www.InternetworkExpert.com Toll […]

The route just needs to be installed in the routing table so you can advertise it into BGP. You can either do this by adding a Loopback that’s in the subnet or doing a static route to null. There is no functional difference between the two since the network doesn’t exist anywhere except […]

This is not for the lab, but real life scenario… So, I don’t need to follow any rules about static routes..
So, will the nating work even if the nat outside command not are on the loopback but on the Ethernet interface. Since you are overloading the loopback interface?
Jens
—–Original Message—– From: Kemal YILDIRIM [mailto:kemalhy@gmail.com] Sent: […]

Group,
Genrally we assign ef dscp vlaue to voice traffic. what is the dscp value most commanly used for http traffic. Task just say assign a dscp value so that traffic is least likely to be dropped..
I am thinking of af33..which is below ef.
Thanks

Why not just create the null route then add a network statement into BGP instead of all that redistributing with a filter?
—–Original Message—– From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Jens Petter Sent: Friday, June 30, 2006 4:28 PM To: masterdt@yahoo.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com Subject: RE: advertising NAT pool in to BGP
Hi,
I just used fictive ip addresses here… […]

Hi Jens, 1- static routes is not allowed otherwise specifically stated. 2- access-list 2 permit 192.168.1.0 will not match inside hosts. access-list 2 permit 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 will match inside hosts
You can create a loopback interface that has the NAT address and advertise it in to BGP with network command. NAT translation can be done to […]