Archive for September, 2006
September 17, 2006 @ 1:59 pm
· Filed under CCIE Study
Here is a post that I sent in the past regarding this issue.
Even though the routers are “adjacent” they won’t become true neighbors with each other. By adjusting the hello/dead timers you can make any OSPF network type become adjacent but that doesn’t mean they will become
functioning OSPF neighbors.
OSPF network types that […]
Permalink
September 17, 2006 @ 1:59 pm
· Filed under CCIE Study
What are : Switchport port-security mac-address 0000.0000.0000.0001 Switchport port-security mac-address 0000.0000.0000.0002 ? Sabrina —– Original Message —- From: “Skinner, Stephen” To: Cisco certification Sent: Sunday, September 17, 2006 9:37:40 AM Subject: 3550 port security , need some clarification please
Gents ,
I am looking […]
Permalink
September 17, 2006 @ 1:01 pm
· Filed under CCIE Study
They are all correct. I’m sure the lab task wording will drive you toward one or the other option. As long as you know all the ways of making it working you are fine. Sabrina
—– Original Message —- From: Peter Cresswell
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com Sent: Sunday, September 17, 2006 9:28:03 AM Subject: […]
Permalink
September 17, 2006 @ 1:01 pm
· Filed under CCIE Study
Thank you for the help…I’ll try. But “ip directed-broadcast” is usually used to allow directed broadcast traffic to be forworded out of that interface as regular broacast. It should not affect ingress traffic on the interface (routers always accept ingress broadcast AFAIK). Anyway, IOS works is misterious ways, you never know […]
Permalink
September 17, 2006 @ 1:00 pm
· Filed under CCIE Study
What you said below is all correct… About your question. Aways from the DocCD Unsupported Features The Catalyst 3550 switch does not support these Cisco IOS router ACL-related features: b”Non-IP protocol ACLs (see Table 29-1). b”Bridge-group ACLs. […]
Permalink
September 17, 2006 @ 12:59 pm
· Filed under CCIE Study
Hi 2nd CCIE, 1) I agree that IP ACL can be applied on the L2 interfaces in general. However, the “Lock and Key” option (dynamic ACL) does not have any affect. In fact, if you apply an ACL with dynamic entries on a L2 interface, the dynamic keyword is ignored. For example, if […]
Permalink
September 17, 2006 @ 12:03 pm
· Filed under CCIE Study
Gents ,
I am looking for some clarification please . The doc CD says the following in reference to static Mac address’s in voice vlans .
When you enable port security on an interface that is also configured with a voice VLAN, you must set the maximum allowed secure addresses on the port to at least two […]
Permalink
September 17, 2006 @ 12:02 pm
· Filed under CCIE Study
Hello all, I’m sure this question comes up all the time, but i’ve had a quick look through the archive and could find a previous posting. I’d like your opinion on the following scenario (hub & spoke over FR, single subnet): Hub / […]
Permalink
September 17, 2006 @ 12:02 pm
· Filed under CCIE Study
Oook,
On your second point - was checking with Wendell Odom’s DQOS book as i remembered that CB Policing is exactly like CAR in regard to the Be value - both are the sum of Bc and the actual Be…
Any idea how can this be check guys?
On 9/17/06, Petr Lapukhov wrote: > > Yep, you […]
Permalink
September 17, 2006 @ 12:01 pm
· Filed under CCIE Study
Here is the rp mapping on R5:
R5#sh ip pim rp map PIM Group-to-RP Mappings This system is an RP (Auto-RP) This system is an RP-mapping agent
Group(s) 224.1.1.1/32 RP 5.5.5.5 (?), v2v1 Info source: 5.5.5.5 (?), elected via Auto-RP Uptime: 00:01:38, […]
Permalink
Next entries » ·
« Previous entries