Job Search, Job Listing, Opportunity
Work at home job, job vacancy
find a job, vacancy list, cari lowongan
Butuh, Segera, secretary, director

Archive for February, 2007

Daylight Savings time. [7:117748]

NTP has nothing to do with Timezone. NTP sends clock ticks, the client then converts these to UTC/GMT. Your xST/xDT will still change at the wrong point.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk648/tk362/technologies_tech_note09186a0080 7ca437.shtml
David
– http://dcp.dcptech.com
> —–Original Message—– > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] > Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 12:58 PM > To: cisco@groupstudy.com > Subject: Daylight Savings time. [7:117748] > > […]

Comments

Am I in the right place? CCIE need 140K [7:117435]

Degrees and Certs are what makes companies able to justify what they charge to their clients for support, which in turn pay your salary.
I think you are looking at it from the wrong angle.
On 2/7/07, jv wrote: > I understand that and agree that it may not be a good example, but my point […]

Comments

Question about BGP Scalability [7:117734]

Thx Peter,
Thanks for clear up the question.
Thanks.
Br,
Sam
On 2/9/07, Sam Fok wrote: > > Thx Peter, > > I am wonder why i still need full-mesh when IGP makes all routers can > access other directly or indirectly. For example: > > Edge A —-B —–C ——D ——-Edge E > […]

Comments

Question about BGP Scalability [7:117734]

Sam
You do not need a full physical mesh between all the BGP routers in your network. You will still need to have a full mesh of IBGP peerings though.
ie
Router A will need to peer with B, C, D, and E Router B will need to peer with A, C, D, and E […]

Comments

Question about BGP Scalability [7:117734]

Thx Peter,
I am wonder why i still need full-mesh when IGP makes all routers can access other directly or indirectly. For example:
Edge A —-B —–C ——D ——-Edge E
In above, A and E don’t have direct connect to C, but we still can use IGP to let A/E to form IBGP and thus i don’t […]

Comments

Virtual Pod Live CD (and Dynamips, generally) [7:117617]

FWIW - in the DynaMips .net files you can specify a startup config, which I believe will get used anytime you erase the temp files … “cnfg = c:PathToFileConfigFilename.cfg”
/TJ
>—–Original Message—– >From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] >Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 19:47 >To: cisco@groupstudy.com >Subject: Re: Virtual Pod Live CD (and Dynamips, generally) [7:117617] > >Cristi P […]

Comments

Tom Larus’ CCIE Warm-Up e-books (volume I and [7:117719]

thanks mate,
cheers
Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=117762&t=117719 ————————————————– FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html

Comments

a question about dynamic NAT [7:117721]

Sorry made a typo..acl 29 should read acl 20.
Regards Roy
Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=117761&t=117721 ————————————————– FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html

Comments

Windows slow [7:117739]

I suspect mtu/mss. Try
ip tcp mss-adjust 1388 on the lan interface of the rtr
Windoze needs a little help with this stuff. You can be sure, by setting up a sniff with ethereal and look for FRAGMENTS. If this is a VPN and youre using a tunnel interface add the mss adjust and […]

Comments

a question about dynamic NAT [7:117721]

Hello As far as I can see, there shouldn’t be a problem here… The routes to both 99.40.165.70 & 10.40.164.233 hang off FastEthernet0/0, which you have configured for ip nat inside. As such provided they meet the criteria of the ip nat inside source list 20 statement, which they do as they are permitted by […]

Comments

· « Previous entries