Go CCIE Go!! - A Cisco Certified Internetwork Expert

Let’s say you have the following config:
!!!!!!!! !! R1 !! !!!!!!!! router bgp 100 no synchronization bgp log-neighbor-changes redistribute connected neighbor 10.1.12.2 remote-as 200 !!!-R2 neighbor 10.1.12.2 advertise-map LOOPBACK non-exist-map NON-EXIST neighbor 10.1.13.3 remote-as 200 !!!-R3 no auto-summary ! ip prefix-list LOOPBACK seq 5 permit 1.1.1.0/24 […]

This is a good article on the subject
http://blog.internetworkexpert.com/category/ccie-routing-switching/interior-gateway-routing/ —– Original Message —– From: “Usama Pervaiz” To: “Cisco certification” Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2008 2:49 PM Subject: Route redistribution question
> Hello all, > > I have a quick question on redistribution. I apologize if this has > been asked already. > > […]

is there any significant difference between using ip igmp access-group and blocking the same traffic using ip access-group ? if theres not i dont see why they would even have the command ‘ip igmp access-group’ so I thought there must be something, i cant find anything and it would be […]

Is there any way to allow certain show coamands to lower privilege levels?
Example - Need to give level 5 show ip route but nothing else?
Command; privilege exec level 5 show ip route
Auto creates the following; privilege exec level 5 show ip privilege exec level 5 show
And in level 5 we can show anything. If i […]

Narbik , you really proved yr knowledge.> Date: Sat, 31 May 2008 11:31:29 -0700> From: narbikk@gmail.com> To: chris.gray@ozonenetworks.net> Subject: Re: IPV6 Tunnelling> CC: ccielab@groupstudy.com> > *There are 5 tunneling solution in IPv6:*> **> 1. *Using the ‘Tunnel mode ipv6ip’, in this case the tunnel source and> destination are configured with IPv4 addressing and the tunnel […]

As is everything else, the direction is from the perspective of the switch/router. Rx, ingress - into the switch/router; Tx, egress - out of the switch/router.
Adel.
—–Original Message—– From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of ahmed badr Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2008 9:57 AM To: Athaide, Dwayne Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com Subject: Re: RSPAN question
rx. It’s the same logic […]

VTP domain: null Cisco switch doesn’t advertise VTP until configured with a domain name, but it accepts VTP message and use the first domain name for itself.
On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 12:58 AM, Ferreira, Marina wrote:
> Does it forward messages when all switches are in NULL domain? Does it > consider a […]

Does it forward messages when all switches are in NULL domain? Does it consider a domain match?
—–Original Message—– From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Mike Harrison Sent: sabado, 31 de maio de 2008 13:24 To: Thor Kopp; Sadiq Yakasai Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com Subject: Re: ISL Trunks
Thor
I dont think that this is true. V2 doesnt forward […]

I generally work with this acronym with it comes to RR.
NC CA
From non client -> Reflect to Clients only From Clients -> Reflect to all
HTH Sadiq

Hello all,
I have a quick question on redistribution. I apologize if this has been asked already.
I have two routers lets say R1 and R2 both with two interface fa0/0 and fa0/1 (for simplicity). R1 fa0/0 and R2 fa0/0 are both in OSPF and are in area 0 (there are other routers in the middle) that […]