Job Search, Job Listing, Opportunity
Work at home job, job vacancy
find a job, vacancy list, cari lowongan
Butuh, Segera, secretary, director

Archive for November, 2008

DE Marking with MIN CIR

Mincir is for traffic shaping (YOUR point of view)
DE is done by the SP/switch CIR rate (SP’s point of view)
You can pre-mark things as DE to make traffic not count against CIR for SP, but that’s all them and not your view.
HTH,
Scott Morris, CCIE4 #4713, JNCIE-M #153, JNCIS-ER, CISSP, et al. CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-ER […]

Comments

EIGRP Maximum-hop

Just for the heck of it, here’s an IP Internal Route update being received on R4 from R5 via HDLC (this network is locally attached to R5):
No. Time Source […]

Comments

MQC

Hi Moh,
I don’t believe “rate-limit” will provide “guaranteed” bandwidth as does “bandwidth” used in MQC. I guess another alternative to using MQC for this purpose could be legacy custom queuing.
Jason
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 5:07 PM, Mohamed Tandou wrote:
> GS, > > let say i want to allocate 3k bandwidth to […]

Comments

EIGRP Maximum-hop

Hi again Paul!
Hop count is actually carried in the EIGRP “IP Internal Routes TLV” and the “IP External Routes TLV” (Doyle Vol I is a great reference for this and similar such topics). A router advertises a directly connected network with a hop count of zero and it’s incremented from there by subsequent routers […]

Comments

MQC

GS,
let say i want to allocate 3k bandwidth to telnet traffic i want to use MQC my answer will be.
class-map match-all TELNET match protocol telnet or i can access-group if i don’t want to use NBAR
policy-map QOS class TELNET bandwidth 3000
If i don’t want to use MQC, using rate limit or traffic shape rate will […]

Comments

Priority command

> The link mentions that “During congestion conditions, a priority class cannot use any excess bandwidth”. Perhaps that is what you are thinking of.
That’s precisely what I was thinking of Paul!
Now this whole thing gets interesting when you really ponder the definition of “congestion.” It’s tempting to think that 129 kbps […]

Comments

Priority command

Hi Scott,
The link mentions that “During congestion conditions, a priority class cannot use any excess bandwidth”. Perhaps that is what you are thinking of.
However, if I remember right (and I may not) the inbuilt policer affects process switched traffic all the time, but fast/cef switched transit traffic is only limited if there is interface congestion. […]

Comments

Priority command

Hi Anthony,
Isn’t there a particular scenario when the policer would be active and one when it wouldn’t be?
Thanks,
Scott
—–Original Message—– From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Anthony Sequeira Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2008 12:25 PM To: shank shank Cc: CCIE Group Subject: Re: Priority command
Yes - the priority command is used with Low Latency Queuing (LLQ) […]

Comments

Rip metric in redistribution….

Pavel,
Wasn’t it you that recently said that the 3rd Edition of the Cert Guide was your primary source of study for the written? If I’ve got that correctly, please check out the second sentence of the second paragraph of page 187. Then go build a simple RIP lab to prove it to yourself.
As a […]

Comments

DE Marking with MIN CIR

The legacy method, by the way is the de-group/de-list commands.
—–Original Message—– From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of shank shank Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2008 5:18 PM To: CCIE Group Subject: DE Marking with MIN CIR
hello experts, […]

Comments

· « Previous entries