.jpg "Opportunities, Appliacation, Openings")
.jpg "Hand Job, Blow Job, Job Search, Monster Job")
.jpg "pusat resume, daftar kerja, cari kerja")
.jpg "Project Manager, SOftware Engineer, SAP Consultant")
L2 vs L3 mpls
Scott and I recommend to review RFC 2549, which covers some important transport information. Delivered-To: marvin@ipexpert.com Received: by 10.142.161.6 with SMTP id j6cs614wfe; Wed, 25 Jun 2008 18:36:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.90.68.20 with SMTP id q20mr14542572aga.107.1214444210887; Wed, 25 Jun 2008 18:36:50 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from lists.groupstudy.com (lists.groupstudy.com [67.19.171.90]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 7si11277889ywo.7.2008.06.25.18.36.50; Wed, 25 Jun 2008 18:36:50 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of ccielab-owner@groupstudy.com designates 67.19.171.90 as permitted sender) client-ip=67.19.171.90; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of ccielab-owner@groupstudy.com designates 67.19.171.90 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=ccielab-owner@groupstudy.com; dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com Received: from lists.groupstudy.com (lists [127.0.0.1]) by lists.groupstudy.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m5Q1aLj0014653; Wed, 25 Jun 2008 21:36:21 -0400 Received: (from sympa@localhost) by lists.groupstudy.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id m5Q1aKtL014639; Wed, 25 Jun 2008 21:36:20 -0400 Received: from groupstudy.com (groupstudy.com [208.73.222.90]) by lists.groupstudy.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m5Q1a1×2014475 for ; Wed, 25 Jun 2008 21:36:01 -0400 Received: from groupstudy.com (groupstudy.com [127.0.0.1]) by groupstudy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m5Q1aCAC002328 GroupStudy Mailer; Wed, 25 Jun 2008 21:36:12 -0400 Received: (from listserver@localhost) by groupstudy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/Submit) id m5Q1aC9Z002326 for ccielabxhiddenx; Wed, 25 Jun 2008 21:36:12 -0400 Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.180]) by groupstudy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m5Q1aBJ4002306 GroupStudy Mailer; Wed, 25 Jun 2008 21:36:11 -0400 Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id v33so1178956wah.24 for ; Wed, 25 Jun 2008 18:36:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=pvdV4M9LGQSdeWPBZskURb95xGkABIewl7nkRpMYKOA=; b=vFHFL/f85rzV8wWrPZpXDoDCbECW7pLIO3ucduRwE6xCTEd7B+JXlX2W8qycoUx3pI /hNNkIx5rurhNfchS0BbN/y/FQRrIkiTkOX5HdwxeYcKyN2RQguCwEHdbmCF5X14Lj/g mNvV01azgl3RqjBPKyl2q4B7h/Zk72vHo9jX4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=T5JAxtAxnwbQXSJeCUTRj2891BdxukZ/3wQTkFtVi63pQmBAtazjsCyXhW6rYPxE30 DSwA2cN+/AlkRkPxgNIKfDwzr+glAfi/DAgbDTANwMNoT++2jkkYi824wtTnK2YyZVde Tr9DZ7orjBJjH4QEO+r9fSJDd5Y+jvkw73LLg= Received: by 10.115.50.5 with SMTP id c5mr6669507wak.60.1214444167998; Wed, 25 Jun 2008 18:36:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.167.13 with HTTP; Wed, 25 Jun 2008 18:36:07 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 11:36:07 +1000 From: “Radioactive Frog” To: “L. Jankok” Subject: Re: OT: L2 vs L3 mpls Cc: “GNS3 and SecureCRT Tabs” In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=”us-ascii” References: X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by GroupStudy X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain X-ASK-Info: Whitelist match [from pbhatkoti@gmail.com] (2008/06/25 21:36:12) Sender: nobody@groupstudy.com Reply-To: “Radioactive Frog” X-Loop: ccielab@groupstudy.com X-Sequence: 7421 Errors-to: ccielab-owner@groupstudy.com Precedence: list X-no-archive: yes List-Id: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Which one is the fast?
Has anyone done testing …? eg. thorughput, speed etc…
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 11:26 AM, L. Jankok wrote:
> L2 mpls vpls if you want transparent ethernet and don’t want to participate > in the routing stuff. > > L3 mpls if you want to participate in the routing stuff. > > > On Thu, 26 Jun 2008 11:30:52 +1000 > “Radioactive Frog” wrote: > : Anyone shed some light on this? > : -Which one to choose, and why… > : : : > _______________________________________________________________________ > : Subscription information may be found at: > : http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html > : : : :
